Comments on: The Memeorandum “Problem” http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:36:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Paul Montgomery http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/#comment-143 Paul Montgomery Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:51:22 +0000 http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=8#comment-143 A belated answer to your question, Pete: short answer is no; long answer is Gabe should not be worried by us really as though our function sets may end up overlapping somewhat, our approach is different. A belated answer to your question, Pete: short answer is no; long answer is Gabe should not be worried by us really as though our function sets may end up overlapping somewhat, our approach is different.

]]> By: xman http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/#comment-34 xman Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:45:27 +0000 http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=8#comment-34 1) Too Male 2) Too American 3) Too boring Memeoranum is heading towards my probation folder unless it gets more interesting and effective a lot faster. Cutting out crappy links to Web 2.0 articles would be a good start. Of course, anything that starts with the assumption that there is some kind of A-list has to be broken - the definition of A-list seems to be self-serving, self-referential, self-important and American. Self-abuse springs to mind too. 1) Too Male
2) Too American
3) Too boring

Memeoranum is heading towards my probation folder unless it gets more interesting and effective a lot faster. Cutting out crappy links to Web 2.0 articles would be a good start.

Of course, anything that starts with the assumption that there is some kind of A-list has to be broken - the definition of A-list seems to be self-serving, self-referential, self-important and American. Self-abuse springs to mind too.

]]> By: PeteCashmore http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/#comment-30 PeteCashmore Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:34:42 +0000 http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=8#comment-30 Hehe - yep, I spotted the irony of that post. On the other hand, it is generally easier to get on Memeorandum at the weekends, since less people post then. Paul - is Tinfinger going to create a franchise around the Memeorandum concept? I know that Tinfinger is positioning in that space, but I don't know much about it. Hehe - yep, I spotted the irony of that post. On the other hand, it is generally easier to get on Memeorandum at the weekends, since less people post then.

Paul - is Tinfinger going to create a franchise around the Memeorandum concept? I know that Tinfinger is positioning in that space, but I don’t know much about it.

]]> By: Paul Montgomery http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/#comment-28 Paul Montgomery Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:25:05 +0000 http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=8#comment-28 I think Memeorandum is a proof of concept waiting for someone to turn it into a franchise business. http://tinfinger.blogspot.com/2005/10/critique-of-memeorandum.html I think Memeorandum is a proof of concept waiting for someone to turn it into a franchise business.

http://tinfinger.blogspot.com/2005/10/critique-of-memeorandum.html

]]> By: Ivan Pope http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/10/30/the-memeorandum-problem/#comment-27 Ivan Pope Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:53:39 +0000 http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=8#comment-27 My four issues with Memeorandum: 1. No transparency 2. No user input 3. No user customisation 4. Too damn American Apart from that, I find it addictive and now know more about top level US politics than I really should. My four issues with Memeorandum:
1. No transparency
2. No user input
3. No user customisation
4. Too damn American
Apart from that, I find it addictive and now know more about top level US politics than I really should.

]]>