<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traitors in our Midst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Defiterka</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-195076</link>
		<dc:creator>Defiterka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-195076</guid>
		<description>Информативно,продолжай в том же духе</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Информативно,продолжай в том же духе</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The makings of a media mogul: Michael Arrington of TechCrunch » By Elias Bizannes » article » Liako.Biz</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-194404</link>
		<dc:creator>The makings of a media mogul: Michael Arrington of TechCrunch » By Elias Bizannes » article » Liako.Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-194404</guid>
		<description>[...] did was successfully exploit this dynamic by recognising the rising investment trend occurring. He built a community around Web 2.0 by being its tireless champion and channeling existing energies. And as the community grew, so did he. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did was successfully exploit this dynamic by recognising the rising investment trend occurring. He built a community around Web 2.0 by being its tireless champion and channeling existing energies. And as the community grew, so did he. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hindsight 20/20 - Part 2 of ‘Web 2.0 is dead and here is why’ &#124; TechWinter</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-194238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hindsight 20/20 - Part 2 of ‘Web 2.0 is dead and here is why’ &#124; TechWinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-194238</guid>
		<description>[...] want to thank Richard MacManus, Russell Shaw, Michael Arrington, and Dave Winer for starting this discussion, and to anyone that has contributed to throughout the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to thank Richard MacManus, Russell Shaw, Michael Arrington, and Dave Winer for starting this discussion, and to anyone that has contributed to throughout the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 is dead and here is why &#124; TechWinter</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-194237</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 is dead and here is why &#124; TechWinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-194237</guid>
		<description>[...] 2.0 is an entirely new iteration of the web which Michael Arrington happily points out as a reason why there is life in Web 2.0 and I for the most part agree. As well [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.0 is an entirely new iteration of the web which Michael Arrington happily points out as a reason why there is life in Web 2.0 and I for the most part agree. As well [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 趨勢力 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 詹宏志與吳昇眼中的Web 3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-78622</link>
		<dc:creator>趨勢力 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 詹宏志與吳昇眼中的Web 3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-78622</guid>
		<description>[...] 看多了媒體大吹大擂所謂的Web 2.0概念，很高興聽到『Web2.0 is overhyped』的檢討聲，而在去年年終的時刻，也聽聞吳老師以及他的團隊捎來嶄新的觀念和作品，格外令人關注。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 看多了媒體大吹大擂所謂的Web 2.0概念，很高興聽到『Web2.0 is overhyped』的檢討聲，而在去年年終的時刻，也聽聞吳老師以及他的團隊捎來嶄新的觀念和作品，格外令人關注。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call it what you want, the Web is Changing</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-48063</link>
		<dc:creator>Call it what you want, the Web is Changing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-48063</guid>
		<description>[...] Tara Hunt put it best in a comment on Mike Arrington’s Traitors in our Midst: “I think what’s really dead is the discussion of whether Web 2.0 is real/unreal/a bubble/a whatever - it’s like blogging about blogging…it gets old.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tara Hunt put it best in a comment on Mike Arrington’s Traitors in our Midst: “I think what’s really dead is the discussion of whether Web 2.0 is real/unreal/a bubble/a whatever &#8211; it’s like blogging about blogging…it gets old.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technological Winter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hindsight 20/20 - Part 2 of &#8216;Web 2.0 is dead and here is why&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-3674</link>
		<dc:creator>Technological Winter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hindsight 20/20 - Part 2 of &#8216;Web 2.0 is dead and here is why&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 09:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-3674</guid>
		<description>[...] I want to thank Richard MacManus, Russell Shaw, Michael Arrington, and Dave Winer for starting this discussion, and to anyone that has contributed to throughout the blogosphere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I want to thank Richard MacManus, Russell Shaw, Michael Arrington, and Dave Winer for starting this discussion, and to anyone that has contributed to throughout the blogosphere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technological Winter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 is dead and here is why</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Technological Winter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 is dead and here is why</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 09:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 is an entirely new iteration of the web which Michael Arrington happily points out as a reason why there is life in Web 2.0 and I for the most part agree. As well I believe Michael is right in believing Web 2.0 technologies make the web more of a community like it was in the &#8216;beginning&#8217; before the .com days in the late 90&#8217;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 is an entirely new iteration of the web which Michael Arrington happily points out as a reason why there is life in Web 2.0 and I for the most part agree. As well I believe Michael is right in believing Web 2.0 technologies make the web more of a community like it was in the &#8216;beginning&#8217; before the .com days in the late 90&#8217;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that would explain Bob&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NEWS ALERT :: IBM and New Zealand[er] declares Web 2.0 is not a FAD !</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-3630</link>
		<dc:creator>that would explain Bob&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NEWS ALERT :: IBM and New Zealand[er] declares Web 2.0 is not a FAD !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-3630</guid>
		<description>[...] Well remember the other day&#8230; when I mentioned the infamous quote I heard&#8230; &#8220;the internet is a FAD like the HAM Radio!&quot; from the IBM Manager on the plane&#8230; circa 1996&#8230; well they are doing it all again with Web 2.0&#8230; and another FAD falls&#8230; from CrunchNotes&#8230; Michael Arrington chides Richard with&#8230; &quot;When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t about a definition, its about what&#8217;s happening on the web today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well remember the other day&#8230; when I mentioned the infamous quote I heard&hellip; &ldquo;the internet is a FAD like the HAM Radio!&quot; from the IBM Manager on the plane&#8230; circa 1996&hellip; well they are doing it all again with Web 2.0&hellip; and another FAD falls&#8230; from CrunchNotes&#8230; Michael Arrington chides Richard with&#8230; &quot;When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&rsquo;t about a definition, its about what&rsquo;s happening on the web today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchNotes &#187; Richard MacManus Loves Web 2.0 Again</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2005/12/19/treason-in-our-midst/comment-page-2/#comment-3595</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchNotes &#187; Richard MacManus Loves Web 2.0 Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 12:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=88#comment-3595</guid>
		<description>[...] When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t about a definition, its about what&#8217;s happening on the web today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t about a definition, its about what&#8217;s happening on the web today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
