<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Plaxo Virus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geek Land &#124; Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-194719</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Land &#124; Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-194719</guid>
		<description>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-194718</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-194718</guid>
		<description>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; The Good NET Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-194717</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; The Good NET Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-194717</guid>
		<description>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-194716</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-194716</guid>
		<description>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier that decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier that decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; TechDozer</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-194715</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s Not Put Tagged In The DeadPool Just Yet &#124; TechDozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-194715</guid>
		<description>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Plaxo showed to everyone&#8217;s dismay earlier this decade by turning invitation spam into an art form. Back in 2007 I noted that Tagged was very aggressive with address book imports: &#8220;Tagged is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plaxo 3.0 - All about sync : Mike Villar: Rising Internet Star</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-91333</link>
		<dc:creator>Plaxo 3.0 - All about sync : Mike Villar: Rising Internet Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-91333</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been using Plaxo to organize and keep my contacts up to date for over a year now. Of course, I did so intense adverse criticism from the likes of Jason Calacanis and Web 2.0 snob par excellence Michael Arrington notwithstanding.Plaxo&#8217;s value proposition is novel yet incredibly simple&#8211;use the service to organize your contacts, update all your contacts with any changes in your contact information (new Phone number, new Email address etc.), and request/receive updates on changes on any of your contacts&#8217; details. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been using Plaxo to organize and keep my contacts up to date for over a year now. Of course, I did so intense adverse criticism from the likes of Jason Calacanis and Web 2.0 snob par excellence Michael Arrington notwithstanding.Plaxo&#8217;s value proposition is novel yet incredibly simple&#8211;use the service to organize your contacts, update all your contacts with any changes in your contact information (new Phone number, new Email address etc.), and request/receive updates on changes on any of your contacts&#8217; details. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What people want</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-67349</link>
		<dc:creator>The Woodwork &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What people want</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-67349</guid>
		<description>[...] First as a reducto ad absurdum, let’s consider an extreme case. Last year, back when I worked at Plaxo, I read this article from Michael Arrington, then of the rising star website TechCrunch. Stacy, Thanks for the note. I just hate the fact that I have to go to your site and go through a multi-step process to ask you not to email me anymore. And then I have to do that for each and every email address I have. And when I get a new email address I have to go through the process for that as well. Imagine if I had to do this for every site on the internet. Your model doesn’t scale. We don’t need to engage in a dialog here - I know what you are going to say and you know what I am going to say. I just hope, someday, you guys kill off this spammy feature. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First as a reducto ad absurdum, let’s consider an extreme case. Last year, back when I worked at Plaxo, I read this article from Michael Arrington, then of the rising star website TechCrunch. Stacy, Thanks for the note. I just hate the fact that I have to go to your site and go through a multi-step process to ask you not to email me anymore. And then I have to do that for each and every email address I have. And when I get a new email address I have to go through the process for that as well. Imagine if I had to do this for every site on the internet. Your model doesn’t scale. We don’t need to engage in a dialog here &#8211; I know what you are going to say and you know what I am going to say. I just hope, someday, you guys kill off this spammy feature. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en franÃ§ais &#187; Plaxo dÃ©sormais un peu moins mÃ©chant</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en franÃ§ais &#187; Plaxo dÃ©sormais un peu moins mÃ©chant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>[...] Et si vous bloggez sur Plaxo ou exprimez votre mÃ©contentement en public, Plaxo vous enverra un de ses reprÃ©sentants qui tentera patiemment de vous contredire dans vos commentaires. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Et si vous bloggez sur Plaxo ou exprimez votre mÃ©contentement en public, Plaxo vous enverra un de ses reprÃ©sentants qui tentera patiemment de vous contredire dans vos commentaires. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Plaxo: Now With Less Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Plaxo: Now With Less Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>[...] And if you blog about Plaxo, or otherwise publicly voice your discontent, Plaxo will send a representative to patiently beat you into submission in the comments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And if you blog about Plaxo, or otherwise publicly voice your discontent, Plaxo will send a representative to patiently beat you into submission in the comments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/01/03/the-plaxo-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=109#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Wow, With is dialogue, I could have hit the delete key enough to kill all the precieved spam which plaxo sends   and then some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, With is dialogue, I could have hit the delete key enough to kill all the precieved spam which plaxo sends   and then some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
