<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Chat on TechCrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PeteCashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteCashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>Moritz,

Yep, site-wide chatting is good, but we already tried that with shoutboxes and similar tools.  As I see it, 3Bubbles simply isn't useful for the vast majority of blogs and bloggers.  Sell those AlexaDex shares, people! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moritz,</p>
<p>Yep, site-wide chatting is good, but we already tried that with shoutboxes and similar tools.  As I see it, 3Bubbles simply isn&#8217;t useful for the vast majority of blogs and bloggers.  Sell those AlexaDex shares, people! <img src='http://www.crunchnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moritz</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>moritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>I guess you should have one chat instead of a chat for every post. That way you could focus the little chat traffic you have in one central point. Second thing is, that if you want to it really to work out you probably have to be online yourself from time to time.

Moritz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you should have one chat instead of a chat for every post. That way you could focus the little chat traffic you have in one central point. Second thing is, that if you want to it really to work out you probably have to be online yourself from time to time.</p>
<p>Moritz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Podcast &#187; TechCruch Now With Chat but Without Chatters</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Podcast &#187; TechCruch Now With Chat but Without Chatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Arrington has added 3bubbles chat to TechCrunch &#8211; and nobody is chatting. Really &#8211; it makes very little sense to have chat on a blog and the fact that nobody is using it on a popular site such as TechCrunch should give the 3Bubbles people some headaches. Blogs have a chat feature &#8211; it&#8217;s called comments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Arrington has added 3bubbles chat to TechCrunch &#8211; and nobody is chatting. Really &#8211; it makes very little sense to have chat on a blog and the fact that nobody is using it on a popular site such as TechCrunch should give the 3Bubbles people some headaches. Blogs have a chat feature &#8211; it&#8217;s called comments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kinnon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>Does seem to bring the children out to play. Which may or may not be a bad thing. I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does seem to bring the children out to play. Which may or may not be a bad thing. I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteCashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteCashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>I'm still sticking by my conviction that 3bubbles will work much better on centralized sites like MySpace and Tagworld than the vast majority of low-traffic blogs.  News aggregators are a possibility, too.  And even if they're archiving these chats, I wonder about the permalink issues (archived chats will always have a much worse signal-to-noise ratio than blog comments):

http://mashable.com/2006/02/12/3bubbles-why-im-skeptical-about-live-chat-on-blogs/

I'm not saying it's a bad idea necessarily, but the long tail of blogs seems to be at odds with live chat (which requires critical mass to be useful).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still sticking by my conviction that 3bubbles will work much better on centralized sites like MySpace and Tagworld than the vast majority of low-traffic blogs.  News aggregators are a possibility, too.  And even if they&#8217;re archiving these chats, I wonder about the permalink issues (archived chats will always have a much worse signal-to-noise ratio than blog comments):</p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2006/02/12/3bubbles-why-im-skeptical-about-live-chat-on-blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2006/02/12/3bubbles-why-im-skeptical-about-live-chat-on-blogs/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s a bad idea necessarily, but the long tail of blogs seems to be at odds with live chat (which requires critical mass to be useful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshR</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/02/15/live-chat-on-techcrunch/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=146#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>This is a very cool feature! I wanted to mention that Newsvine also offers a similar tool on their site but it's in flash and embedded directly into the page for each article. 

I love the idea of enabling viewers to interact with each other!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very cool feature! I wanted to mention that Newsvine also offers a similar tool on their site but it&#8217;s in flash and embedded directly into the page for each article. </p>
<p>I love the idea of enabling viewers to interact with each other!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
