<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m an Asshole, and other breaking news.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blog.culliss.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m a Sucker, You&#8217;re a Sucker, We are Suckers Too&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-61631</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.culliss.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m a Sucker, You&#8217;re a Sucker, We are Suckers Too&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-61631</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington has stooped to a new low in fostering negative thinking on the Internet. In this recent post the former lawyer and self-confessed posterior feature has started a small contest to entice people to start bashing his posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington has stooped to a new low in fostering negative thinking on the Internet. In this recent post the former lawyer and self-confessed posterior feature has started a small contest to entice people to start bashing his posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Hire an Expert? (Or What the Hell is Mike Thinking?) &#124; Pearsonified</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-15989</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Hire an Expert? (Or What the Hell is Mike Thinking?) &#124; Pearsonified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-15989</guid>
		<description>[...] In the wake of all the bad press and even worse commentary from Michael over at CrunchNotes, Rachel Cunliffe resigned as the TechCrunch designer. I hope like hell that she collected a nice check before making her announcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the wake of all the bad press and even worse commentary from Michael over at CrunchNotes, Rachel Cunliffe resigned as the TechCrunch designer. I hope like hell that she collected a nice check before making her announcement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanustep</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanustep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3754</guid>
		<description>Marketing, Marketing, Marketing...ego, ego, ego...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing, Marketing, Marketing&#8230;ego, ego, ego&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 08:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3731</guid>
		<description>This is a classic case of not charging enough. I&#039;m sure if Rachel&#039;s fee was high enough, then she wouldn&#039;t care what her client did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a classic case of not charging enough. I&#8217;m sure if Rachel&#8217;s fee was high enough, then she wouldn&#8217;t care what her client did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheney in town</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheney in town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 08:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>Ran this thru Dick Cheney who was in SF this week, and he loves the green. Case closed. EOD, Govn will pick. Sorry. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran this thru Dick Cheney who was in SF this week, and he loves the green. Case closed. EOD, Govn will pick. Sorry. <img src='http://www.crunchnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teli Adlam</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Teli Adlam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 02:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>Hello Michael,
I&#039;ve been a lurker for nearly a year, but felt I should comment about the recent noise that&#039;s been going on regarding TechCrunch and the redesign.

&lt;blockquote&gt;If Rachel chose to take that post as a different message...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfortunately, Rachel&#039;s not the only one who saw it that way. &lt;em&gt;I&#039;m speaking with my Jane B. Average hat on, not my web designer hat.&lt;/em&gt;

Someone who may not realize there are other posts surrounding the redesign (i.e. finds her way to that particular link from another site or the search engines) would initially think you were taking a pop at your previous designer. I&#039;m not saying you were, but simply, that&#039;s how it seems.

It&#039;s important to look at how your post may be construed from a different perspective.

While I don&#039;t condone how she resigned (if what you say is fact), I can understand why she did it.

I certainly hope that you and Rachel can work this out cordially.

~ Teli</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Michael,<br />
I&#8217;ve been a lurker for nearly a year, but felt I should comment about the recent noise that&#8217;s been going on regarding TechCrunch and the redesign.</p>
<blockquote><p>If Rachel chose to take that post as a different message&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, Rachel&#8217;s not the only one who saw it that way. <em>I&#8217;m speaking with my Jane B. Average hat on, not my web designer hat.</em></p>
<p>Someone who may not realize there are other posts surrounding the redesign (i.e. finds her way to that particular link from another site or the search engines) would initially think you were taking a pop at your previous designer. I&#8217;m not saying you were, but simply, that&#8217;s how it seems.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to look at how your post may be construed from a different perspective.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t condone how she resigned (if what you say is fact), I can understand why she did it.</p>
<p>I certainly hope that you and Rachel can work this out cordially.</p>
<p>~ Teli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>Well, hey... Text Link Ads bought the 7 thousand dollar spot. So you end up okay. No need to give a real apology. $ is everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hey&#8230; Text Link Ads bought the 7 thousand dollar spot. So you end up okay. No need to give a real apology. $ is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3464</guid>
		<description>Regan, please stop this. I know Rachel is your wife and you are going to defend her. But you have to realize that all of these comments are essentially the same, regarless of which side they take. The comments supporting me/hating Rachel, or supporting rachel/hating me are just that, on both sides: hate comments. Rachel is a wonderful person and a wonderful designer. I don&#039;t hate her or blame her for resigning. I wish this hadn&#039;t been done publicly, but she felt attacked by me and she did it, I assume, to protect herself. In the end, she will always have more work that she can handle and lots of people who will always love her. I will always look back at the time we worked together with happiness, except for the last week.

With regard to Rachel&#039;s resignation, yes she did send an email. As I said, I saw the resignation trackback first because I moderate comments when I wake up. I then saw the valleywag post. I then saw her email. That was just the order I saw things, and I&#039;m sure she sent the email first before she did the other things.

What I wished had happened was this: she could have sent me an email telling me she felt hurt by what I did. I would have taken the offending post down. I would have publicly apologized. I would have done anything to keep her happy. But when the shit hit the fan, and everything was out in the open, I wrote how I felt about the whole situation. 

I have never said a bad word about Rachel as a person or a designer and never will.

I want this to stop. I want the death threats to stop in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regan, please stop this. I know Rachel is your wife and you are going to defend her. But you have to realize that all of these comments are essentially the same, regarless of which side they take. The comments supporting me/hating Rachel, or supporting rachel/hating me are just that, on both sides: hate comments. Rachel is a wonderful person and a wonderful designer. I don&#8217;t hate her or blame her for resigning. I wish this hadn&#8217;t been done publicly, but she felt attacked by me and she did it, I assume, to protect herself. In the end, she will always have more work that she can handle and lots of people who will always love her. I will always look back at the time we worked together with happiness, except for the last week.</p>
<p>With regard to Rachel&#8217;s resignation, yes she did send an email. As I said, I saw the resignation trackback first because I moderate comments when I wake up. I then saw the valleywag post. I then saw her email. That was just the order I saw things, and I&#8217;m sure she sent the email first before she did the other things.</p>
<p>What I wished had happened was this: she could have sent me an email telling me she felt hurt by what I did. I would have taken the offending post down. I would have publicly apologized. I would have done anything to keep her happy. But when the shit hit the fan, and everything was out in the open, I wrote how I felt about the whole situation. </p>
<p>I have never said a bad word about Rachel as a person or a designer and never will.</p>
<p>I want this to stop. I want the death threats to stop in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3463</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3463</guid>
		<description>Sidelines, I am interested to know where all this &quot;drama&quot; is that you&#039;ve talked about from Rachel?  The only thing that she has said was an announcement on her blog that she had resigned AFTER she had emailed her resignation to Michael.  

Michael had contracted Rachel to do work long term, not just for the TC redesign.  Rachel wasn&#039;t resigning from the TC redesign but as the person who has been coding up his sites for the past few months.  The &quot;announcement&quot; that she made on her blog was simply stating that she had resigned.  Not that she was resigning as some tend to believe.

Rachel is up to her neck in work and quite frankly didn&#039;t need the hassle of working with a difficult client who is desperate to get things done and then never actions anything for days and then expects jobs to be rushed and still be at a high standard.  

The only drama in this entire melee is from people assuming that they know the full story when they still can&#039;t tell the difference between a public resignation and an announcement that one has just resigned.  It is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidelines, I am interested to know where all this &#8220;drama&#8221; is that you&#8217;ve talked about from Rachel?  The only thing that she has said was an announcement on her blog that she had resigned AFTER she had emailed her resignation to Michael.  </p>
<p>Michael had contracted Rachel to do work long term, not just for the TC redesign.  Rachel wasn&#8217;t resigning from the TC redesign but as the person who has been coding up his sites for the past few months.  The &#8220;announcement&#8221; that she made on her blog was simply stating that she had resigned.  Not that she was resigning as some tend to believe.</p>
<p>Rachel is up to her neck in work and quite frankly didn&#8217;t need the hassle of working with a difficult client who is desperate to get things done and then never actions anything for days and then expects jobs to be rushed and still be at a high standard.  </p>
<p>The only drama in this entire melee is from people assuming that they know the full story when they still can&#8217;t tell the difference between a public resignation and an announcement that one has just resigned.  It is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on the sidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/16/im-an-asshole-and-other-news/comment-page-2/#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>on the sidelines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 13:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=209#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve followed this silly saga and have noticed &lt;b&gt;Regan&lt;/b&gt; commenting all over the place ... and then  I realised, it&#039;s Rachel&#039;s husband. 

From a complete outsiders viewpoint and I have no bones to pick - but it seems to be simply a case of a over dramatic designer. Very thin-skinned indeed.

The client hired her for a job and it was delivered and paid for. End of story. The collective blogosphere pretty much thought the new design was fugly. So what. Learn from it. Move on. once the design is delivered the client can do what he wants - even hack it to death. Who cares, you&#039;ve been paid.

Clients are always going to be difficult - and as a designer you have to learn to deal with that or get out of the game.

Finally, I&#039;ve not seen one instance of the client attacking the designers work. Not once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve followed this silly saga and have noticed <b>Regan</b> commenting all over the place &#8230; and then  I realised, it&#8217;s Rachel&#8217;s husband. </p>
<p>From a complete outsiders viewpoint and I have no bones to pick &#8211; but it seems to be simply a case of a over dramatic designer. Very thin-skinned indeed.</p>
<p>The client hired her for a job and it was delivered and paid for. End of story. The collective blogosphere pretty much thought the new design was fugly. So what. Learn from it. Move on. once the design is delivered the client can do what he wants &#8211; even hack it to death. Who cares, you&#8217;ve been paid.</p>
<p>Clients are always going to be difficult &#8211; and as a designer you have to learn to deal with that or get out of the game.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;ve not seen one instance of the client attacking the designers work. Not once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
