<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard MacManus Loves Web 2.0 Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scripting News Annex &#187; I still say no to web two oh</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>Scripting News Annex &#187; I still say no to web two oh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3718</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard MacManus relents, and decides that Web 2.0 is here to stay, and Mike Arrington sighs in relief and explains why he remains loyal to the concept. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard MacManus relents, and decides that Web 2.0 is here to stay, and Mike Arrington sighs in relief and explains why he remains loyal to the concept. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3707</guid>
		<description>Well, we have a problem. Mr O&#039;Reilly is claiming dibs on Web 2.0. http://www.tomrafteryit.net/oreilly-trademarks-web-20-and-sets-lawyers-on-itcork/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we have a problem. Mr O&#8217;Reilly is claiming dibs on Web 2.0. <a href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/oreilly-trademarks-web-20-and-sets-lawyers-on-itcork/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/oreilly-trademarks-web-20-and-sets-lawyers-on-itcork/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alterion</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>Alterion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 09:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>I know I was, I just thought it was funny :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I was, I just thought it was funny <img src='http://www.crunchnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 04:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>Alterion, u r reading far too much into this.

Dare, I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll find any disagreement from Mike or I on that. As I said in my post, web 2.0 means everything and nothing at the same time :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alterion, u r reading far too much into this.</p>
<p>Dare, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll find any disagreement from Mike or I on that. As I said in my post, web 2.0 means everything and nothing at the same time <img src='http://www.crunchnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 01:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 is a synonym for &quot;Cool, like Flickr and del.icio.us&quot;. What actually makes those sites cool is in teh eye of the beholder. APIs? AJAX? Tagging? The fact that they are startups that got bought by a big company?  Dunno, and quite frankly it doesn&#039;t matter much either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 is a synonym for &#8220;Cool, like Flickr and del.icio.us&#8221;. What actually makes those sites cool is in teh eye of the beholder. APIs? AJAX? Tagging? The fact that they are startups that got bought by a big company?  Dunno, and quite frankly it doesn&#8217;t matter much either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alterion</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Alterion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>when you start talking about web 2.0 as a struggle of inner self and beliefs well then you know something has died.. like common sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when you start talking about web 2.0 as a struggle of inner self and beliefs well then you know something has died.. like common sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Tastes Good - user experience blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Tastes Good - user experience blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What 2.0?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop wasting energy debating the terminology and focus on innovation. I have not necessarily drunk the kool-aid but it is as good a term as any to describe the spirit of innovation that is manifesting all around us. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop wasting energy debating the terminology and focus on innovation. I have not necessarily drunk the kool-aid but it is as good a term as any to describe the spirit of innovation that is manifesting all around us. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scripting News Annex &#187; Scripting News for 5/24/2006</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>Scripting News Annex &#187; Scripting News for 5/24/2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard MacManus relents, and decides that Web 2.0 is here to stay, and Mike Arrington sighs in relief and explains why he remains loyal to the concept. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard MacManus relents, and decides that Web 2.0 is here to stay, and Mike Arrington sighs in relief and explains why he remains loyal to the concept. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that would explain Bob&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NEWS ALERT :: IBM and New Zealand[er] declares Web 2.0 is not a FAD !</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>that would explain Bob&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NEWS ALERT :: IBM and New Zealand[er] declares Web 2.0 is not a FAD !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 23:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>[...] Well remember the other day&#8230; when I mentioned the infamous quote I heard&#8230; &#8220;the internet is a FAD like the HAM Radio!&quot; from the IBM Manager on the plane&#8230; circa 1996&#8230; well they are doing it all again with Web 2.0&#8230; and another FAD falls&#8230; from CrunchNotes&#8230; Michael Arrington chides Richard with&#8230; &quot;When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&#8217;t about a definition, its about what&#8217;s happening on the web today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well remember the other day&#8230; when I mentioned the infamous quote I heard&hellip; &ldquo;the internet is a FAD like the HAM Radio!&quot; from the IBM Manager on the plane&#8230; circa 1996&hellip; well they are doing it all again with Web 2.0&hellip; and another FAD falls&#8230; from CrunchNotes&#8230; Michael Arrington chides Richard with&#8230; &quot;When Richard MacManus declared Web 2.0 dead last year, I said he was crazy. Web 2.0 isn&rsquo;t about a definition, its about what&rsquo;s happening on the web today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/05/22/richard-macmanus-loves-web-20-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=213#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. 

And besides: everbody who starts these dumb debates about the validness of a term is an outsider. Everybody on the inside knows what it means and what value it has in a conversation, so who cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. </p>
<p>And besides: everbody who starts these dumb debates about the validness of a term is an outsider. Everybody on the inside knows what it means and what value it has in a conversation, so who cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
