<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the CrunchBoard Job Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NumnLimbPaumb</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-194522</link>
		<dc:creator>NumnLimbPaumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-194522</guid>
		<description>Привет всем, классный форум тут у вас :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Привет всем, классный форум тут у вас <img src='http://www.crunchnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-118621</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-118621</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Matt...$200 for a 30 day posting on such a young site is not something that&#039;s easily justifiable to your Accounting Department. Even Gawker charges $30 bucks for a 30 day posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Matt&#8230;$200 for a 30 day posting on such a young site is not something that&#8217;s easily justifiable to your Accounting Department. Even Gawker charges $30 bucks for a 30 day posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-14265</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-14265</guid>
		<description>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here. And what I really want to know about are success stories. If you&#8217;ve found a job through CrunchBoard, email me and let me know about it, along with your blog address if you have one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here. And what I really want to know about are success stories. If you&#8217;ve found a job through CrunchBoard, email me and let me know about it, along with your blog address if you have one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonReal: diario profesional de David Monreal sobre Recursos Humanos y reclutamiento online</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-9063</link>
		<dc:creator>MonReal: diario profesional de David Monreal sobre Recursos Humanos y reclutamiento online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-9063</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington, editor del blog tecnológico TechCrunch anuncia que abre hoy un apartado de empleo en su blog: CrunchBoard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington, editor del blog tecnológico TechCrunch anuncia que abre hoy un apartado de empleo en su blog: CrunchBoard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week at backwhack - tech news web 2.0 style</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-9058</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week at backwhack - tech news web 2.0 style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-9058</guid>
		<description>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here.  CrunchBoard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here.  CrunchBoard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-9057</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CrunchBoard Job Board: Stats After One Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-9057</guid>
		<description>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here.  CrunchBoard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More updates as things progress. Thanks to everyone who&#8217;s written about CrunchBoard. Ping me with updates and I&#8217;ll add them here.  CrunchBoard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>Wouldnt the spam problem be solved by a nominal $5 fee?  $200 is more expensive then most job boards. Maybe its just me but im not paying $200 til i am confident the job board is getting the kind of traffic that makes it worth it.  This is why sites like Monster and Jobster can justify the price.  Im sure you will eventualy get there, but im not funding the experiment to see if it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldnt the spam problem be solved by a nominal $5 fee?  $200 is more expensive then most job boards. Maybe its just me but im not paying $200 til i am confident the job board is getting the kind of traffic that makes it worth it.  This is why sites like Monster and Jobster can justify the price.  Im sure you will eventualy get there, but im not funding the experiment to see if it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-8742</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-8742</guid>
		<description>Matt - Two reasons. First, the network solves the chicken and egg problem. Second, free=massive spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; Two reasons. First, the network solves the chicken and egg problem. Second, free=massive spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-8725</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-8725</guid>
		<description>Great Idea.  A no brainer.

However charging for it, right from the get go, was a gigantic strategic mistake.  Job boards are classic chicken or the egg models, and therefore getting critical mass is key. 

Since this job boad is not your only gig why the rush to make a buck?  Let the thing grow a little, and then charge.  If it was free youd have 100X the postings rigth now (my company included).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Idea.  A no brainer.</p>
<p>However charging for it, right from the get go, was a gigantic strategic mistake.  Job boards are classic chicken or the egg models, and therefore getting critical mass is key. </p>
<p>Since this job boad is not your only gig why the rush to make a buck?  Let the thing grow a little, and then charge.  If it was free youd have 100X the postings rigth now (my company included).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart on Rich Internet Applications &#187; Michael Arrington is the Google of Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/08/03/introducing-the-crunchboard-job-site/comment-page-1/#comment-8664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart on Rich Internet Applications &#187; Michael Arrington is the Google of Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=250#comment-8664</guid>
		<description>[...] He has always talked about expanding the TechCrunch family, which he did with MobileCrunch and then a couple of regional versions of his main site. This week, he released CrunchBoard, taking a stab at the niche job market. I thought the site was quite good, though lacking in search, and has a lot of potential. But watching Michael has me wondering if he is the Google of Web 2.0. There is no negative connotation behind that, as I have similar respect for what Google has been able to do - essentially reinvigorating the Ajax space and making developers think about the web in whole new ways. I think Arrington is doing something similar with Web 2.0. He&#8217;s monetized it just as Google was able to do with Search, but he&#8217;s taken it a step further by adding properties, hiring a staff, and pushing the envelope of what a web site is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He has always talked about expanding the TechCrunch family, which he did with MobileCrunch and then a couple of regional versions of his main site. This week, he released CrunchBoard, taking a stab at the niche job market. I thought the site was quite good, though lacking in search, and has a lot of potential. But watching Michael has me wondering if he is the Google of Web 2.0. There is no negative connotation behind that, as I have similar respect for what Google has been able to do &#8211; essentially reinvigorating the Ajax space and making developers think about the web in whole new ways. I think Arrington is doing something similar with Web 2.0. He&#8217;s monetized it just as Google was able to do with Search, but he&#8217;s taken it a step further by adding properties, hiring a staff, and pushing the envelope of what a web site is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

