<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philip Kaplan on Journalism.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/09/22/philip-kaplan-on-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/09/22/philip-kaplan-on-journalism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/09/22/philip-kaplan-on-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-13590</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=283#comment-13590</guid>
		<description>That may be true on your side of the pond but I see less evidence on this  side though admittedly the Red Tops (as we call the tabloids) do a lot of &#039;creative&#039; writing. And remember that in journalism, what the hack wrote isn&#039;t what goes on the page but what the subs and editors want. Different thing. 

What does depress me is the way US press makes a big deal about fact checking yet still makes a ton of errors. 

The real meat is in the &#039;knowledge&#039; commentary. Yer man is spot on. Without personal experience or domain knowledge, all you&#039;re doing is parrotting someone else&#039;s press release, spiced up to attract a readership. How many headlines have you seen that bear no relationship to the content? For which by the way, Oracle is doing a fair job on its website! But that&#039;s another story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be true on your side of the pond but I see less evidence on this  side though admittedly the Red Tops (as we call the tabloids) do a lot of &#8216;creative&#8217; writing. And remember that in journalism, what the hack wrote isn&#8217;t what goes on the page but what the subs and editors want. Different thing. </p>
<p>What does depress me is the way US press makes a big deal about fact checking yet still makes a ton of errors. </p>
<p>The real meat is in the &#8216;knowledge&#8217; commentary. Yer man is spot on. Without personal experience or domain knowledge, all you&#8217;re doing is parrotting someone else&#8217;s press release, spiced up to attract a readership. How many headlines have you seen that bear no relationship to the content? For which by the way, Oracle is doing a fair job on its website! But that&#8217;s another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/09/22/philip-kaplan-on-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-13560</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=283#comment-13560</guid>
		<description>That was &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goebbels&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Goebbels&lt;/a&gt;, Nik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goebbels" rel="nofollow">Goebbels</a>, Nik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Cubrilovic</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/09/22/philip-kaplan-on-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Cubrilovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=283#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of the quote: &quot;journalists say a thing they know isn&#039;t true, in the hope that if they keep on saying it long enough it will be true&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of the quote: &#8220;journalists say a thing they know isn&#8217;t true, in the hope that if they keep on saying it long enough it will be true&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

