<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About TechCrunch UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can&#8217;t we all just be friends? &#124; Paul Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-194651</link>
		<dc:creator>Can&#8217;t we all just be friends? &#124; Paul Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-194651</guid>
		<description>[...] whole story has erupted into a virtual firestorm on a number of sites. Arrington published his side of the story to CrunchNotes and was heavily criticised for publicising what I imagine started out as private [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whole story has erupted into a virtual firestorm on a number of sites. Arrington published his side of the story to CrunchNotes and was heavily criticised for publicising what I imagine started out as private [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hummingbird Temp : More on eMusic</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-194414</link>
		<dc:creator>Hummingbird Temp : More on eMusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-194414</guid>
		<description>[...] to be able to have a mature reasoned debate in the &#8216;blogosphere&#8217;. Sometimes events can convince you such things are impossible.   Posted by Gareth on Thursday, December 21, 2006, at 8:15 pm. Filed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be able to have a mature reasoned debate in the &#8216;blogosphere&#8217;. Sometimes events can convince you such things are impossible.   Posted by Gareth on Thursday, December 21, 2006, at 8:15 pm. Filed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Relaunches UK Blog - Butcher Back as Editor &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-112152</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Relaunches UK Blog - Butcher Back as Editor &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-112152</guid>
		<description>[...] Some people have commented on TC and to me via IM regarding the announcement that they find it a bit odd that Mike B would come back given all the hoopla/drama that surrounded the TC closure last December. It looks like the post has been removed from the UK site, but there appeared to be a large number of UK loyals mad at the entire situation. Butcher posted his side of the story and I can only guess that Butcher made certain editorial and monetary demands this time around. Arrington did note that he was &quot;sorry to see&quot; Butcher get caught up in the mess. In my opinion, so much of the mess could have been avoided if the disagreement was taken offline. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some people have commented on TC and to me via IM regarding the announcement that they find it a bit odd that Mike B would come back given all the hoopla/drama that surrounded the TC closure last December. It looks like the post has been removed from the UK site, but there appeared to be a large number of UK loyals mad at the entire situation. Butcher posted his side of the story and I can only guess that Butcher made certain editorial and monetary demands this time around. Arrington did note that he was &quot;sorry to see&quot; Butcher get caught up in the mess. In my opinion, so much of the mess could have been avoided if the disagreement was taken offline. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I a prolific blogger?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-47133</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I a prolific blogger?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-47133</guid>
		<description>[...] Second note placed on Crunchnotes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Second note placed on Crunchnotes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Software Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogged by Joel Spolsky - Explaining Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-44735</link>
		<dc:creator>My Software Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogged by Joel Spolsky - Explaining Steve Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-44735</guid>
		<description>[...] I thought I would miss the end of the Gang more than I have. Mike Arrington s flareup with Sethi and his revolving news desk door would have made for a lively session or two, but Mike s week-later wrap of the Sethi situation blew away the bullshit and out-ValleyWagged Denton to boot. I ve been pitching in with Jason to tighten up his Cast for the Kids, letting me troll the blogosphere for news bites without having to work too hard or miss the roundtable so much. I spent a great three days or so with Doc, Phil Windley, Kaliya, Dick Hardt, and Kim Cameron among others in the Identity Workshop, talked with Mike Vizard and Dana Gardner intermittently, and watched Robert Anderson and Cori Schlegel cross the line and merge GestureBank with the AttentionTrust only a few weeks behind schedule. And Gabe Rivera chimed in a few days ago in email asking what it would look like if I resurfaced. An eight-foot invisible rabbit.  Rashi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I thought I would miss the end of the Gang more than I have. Mike Arrington s flareup with Sethi and his revolving news desk door would have made for a lively session or two, but Mike s week-later wrap of the Sethi situation blew away the bullshit and out-ValleyWagged Denton to boot. I ve been pitching in with Jason to tighten up his Cast for the Kids, letting me troll the blogosphere for news bites without having to work too hard or miss the roundtable so much. I spent a great three days or so with Doc, Phil Windley, Kaliya, Dick Hardt, and Kim Cameron among others in the Identity Workshop, talked with Mike Vizard and Dana Gardner intermittently, and watched Robert Anderson and Cori Schlegel cross the line and merge GestureBank with the AttentionTrust only a few weeks behind schedule. And Gabe Rivera chimed in a few days ago in email asking what it would look like if I resurfaced. An eight-foot invisible rabbit.  Rashi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I a prolific blogger? at Segala Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-40406</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I a prolific blogger? at Segala Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-40406</guid>
		<description>[...] Second note placed on Crunchnotes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Second note placed on Crunchnotes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-31263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-31263</guid>
		<description>LOL, what a bunch of kids, your professional reps are at stake so if neither of you take it to court then there is an admission of guilt IMHO. 

One of you is a liar and only a court will set that straight so till then both you and your blogs are tarred with the same brush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, what a bunch of kids, your professional reps are at stake so if neither of you take it to court then there is an admission of guilt IMHO. </p>
<p>One of you is a liar and only a court will set that straight so till then both you and your blogs are tarred with the same brush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-31158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-31158</guid>
		<description>The problem here is that Sam has right. The conferece was a spoof and a egocentric showoff for Luic. He wanted politicians, we wanted innovative net solutions. So he deserved the critique and more. He wasted our time and money. Of course we will not attend LeWeb4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem here is that Sam has right. The conferece was a spoof and a egocentric showoff for Luic. He wanted politicians, we wanted innovative net solutions. So he deserved the critique and more. He wasted our time and money. Of course we will not attend LeWeb4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul king</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-30792</link>
		<dc:creator>paul king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-30792</guid>
		<description>I am convinced now more than ever that if these are the kind of problems you have, you all have way too much money.  The &#039;haves&#039; crack me up.  Where&#039;s Rodney when you need him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am convinced now more than ever that if these are the kind of problems you have, you all have way too much money.  The &#8216;haves&#8217; crack me up.  Where&#8217;s Rodney when you need him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Toh</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/20/the-truth-about-techcrunch-uk/comment-page-2/#comment-30458</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Toh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=327#comment-30458</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Sam has launched a new site covering European startups. He has a well designed site, and sponsors. After one week.

That tells me that this was all planned long ago, and Sam took this opportunity to create incredible buzz for himself. At my expense. At Loic’s expense.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well designed? Not really.. Looks like the default wordpress template. No sponsors too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Sam has launched a new site covering European startups. He has a well designed site, and sponsors. After one week.</p>
<p>That tells me that this was all planned long ago, and Sam took this opportunity to create incredible buzz for himself. At my expense. At Loic’s expense.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well designed? Not really.. Looks like the default wordpress template. No sponsors too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
