<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Right For Wired To Predict The Fall Of Digg?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mashable Kindle Hickup, Techcrunch - Wired War Resumes? &#124; Solar OP Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-194720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable Kindle Hickup, Techcrunch - Wired War Resumes? &#124; Solar OP Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-194720</guid>
		<description>[...] TC-Wired war started a couple of years ago, with Michael, in his own unique way, took a couple of low blows at Wired. You could tell there will be blood. Indeed, bloddy it became when Wired criticized the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TC-Wired war started a couple of years ago, with Michael, in his own unique way, took a couple of low blows at Wired. You could tell there will be blood. Indeed, bloddy it became when Wired criticized the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the new shelton wet/dry</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-51450</link>
		<dc:creator>the new shelton wet/dry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-51450</guid>
		<description>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &#8220;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&#8221; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &#8220;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&#8221; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Should Sue Wired&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-51420</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Should Sue Wired&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-51420</guid>
		<description>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &#8220;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&#8221; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest.&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &ldquo;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&rdquo; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; DiggはWiredを訴えるべき</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-51370</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; DiggはWiredを訴えるべき</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-51370</guid>
		<description>[...] Redditが買収されたのは10月後半。Wired誌は、12月にはDigg人気の下降を予測し、「Digg Becomes the New Friendster」（「DiggはFriendsterの二の舞に」）という記事を掲載。この件について、私はCrunchnotesで「利害関係の衝突がある際（その事実を公表すること無しに）報道するのは不適切だ」と書いた。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Redditが買収されたのは10月後半。Wired誌は、12月にはDigg人気の下降を予測し、「Digg Becomes the New Friendster」（「DiggはFriendsterの二の舞に」）という記事を掲載。この件について、私はCrunchnotesで「利害関係の衝突がある際（その事実を公表すること無しに）報道するのは不適切だ」と書いた。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-51342</link>
		<dc:creator>Romney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-51342</guid>
		<description>Is it not right for Dikembe Mutombo to wag his finger at the person who&#039;s shot he just blocked? Was it wrong for the beatles to say they are bigger than jesus? Is it wrong for me to say that Season 2.5 of battlestar galattica was the best and it&#039;s been downhill since there?

I think digg probably is the next friendster, look at the traffic stats. Comparing the two makes sense. Is it wrong to be prescient and do that? it&#039;s the winners that write the history books, not the losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it not right for Dikembe Mutombo to wag his finger at the person who&#8217;s shot he just blocked? Was it wrong for the beatles to say they are bigger than jesus? Is it wrong for me to say that Season 2.5 of battlestar galattica was the best and it&#8217;s been downhill since there?</p>
<p>I think digg probably is the next friendster, look at the traffic stats. Comparing the two makes sense. Is it wrong to be prescient and do that? it&#8217;s the winners that write the history books, not the losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Should Sue Wired</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-51324</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Should Sue Wired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-51324</guid>
		<description>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &#8220;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&#8221; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reddit was acquired in late October. By December, Wired had predicted the fall of Digg, saying &#8220;Digg Becomes the New Friendster&#8221; without disclosing that they were a sister company to a competitor. I wrote about this on Crunchnotes, saying it was inappropriate because of the (undisclosed) conflict of interest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-32009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-32009</guid>
		<description>@Aaron B. Hockley:

Yes, people still read Wired. After a rough patch, the last few years it&#039;s been a fantastic magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron B. Hockley:</p>
<p>Yes, people still read Wired. After a rough patch, the last few years it&#8217;s been a fantastic magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-31208</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-31208</guid>
		<description>They need to use my disclosure policy Wordpress plugin. That way they can automatically add a disclaimer to all their current and past references to Reddit and Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to use my disclosure policy Wordpress plugin. That way they can automatically add a disclaimer to all their current and past references to Reddit and Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-31034</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-31034</guid>
		<description>An editor at Wired should have added a disclaimer that the Wired now owns a Digg competitor, but it seems rather unfair to simply assume that wired is biased.

The people behind the article aren&#039;t exactly getting bonuses based on how well Reddit does. I think they really just think Digg will fizzle out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An editor at Wired should have added a disclaimer that the Wired now owns a Digg competitor, but it seems rather unfair to simply assume that wired is biased.</p>
<p>The people behind the article aren&#8217;t exactly getting bonuses based on how well Reddit does. I think they really just think Digg will fizzle out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Happy New Year links</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2006/12/30/wired-predicts-fall-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-30856</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Happy New Year links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=332#comment-30856</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington brings up conflict of interest between Wired (who owns Reedit) and them predicting Digg&#8217;s downfall.  Hell dude - everybody knows Digg is heading for a fall.  You don&#8217;t have to be a competitor to know that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington brings up conflict of interest between Wired (who owns Reedit) and them predicting Digg&#8217;s downfall.  Hell dude &#8211; everybody knows Digg is heading for a fall.  You don&#8217;t have to be a competitor to know that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
