<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scoble &amp; PayPerPost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-194586</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-194586</guid>
		<description>[...] course all the usual anti-PPP proponents came out immediately after the post with stuff like &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; or &#8220;Robert Scoble announces that he&#8217;s become a paid shill for PayPerPost&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course all the usual anti-PPP proponents came out immediately after the post with stuff like &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; or &#8220;Robert Scoble announces that he&#8217;s become a paid shill for PayPerPost&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is PayPerPost Trying to Outflank the Blogosphere&#8217;s Defenses? &#166; Online Media Cultist</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-59284</link>
		<dc:creator>Is PayPerPost Trying to Outflank the Blogosphere&#8217;s Defenses? &#166; Online Media Cultist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-59284</guid>
		<description>[...] Crunchnotes notes that high profile blogger &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; because he accepted a fee from PayPerPost – a company that pays bloggers to write reviews about products and services – to speak at a conference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crunchnotes notes that high profile blogger &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; because he accepted a fee from PayPerPost – a company that pays bloggers to write reviews about products and services – to speak at a conference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-44298</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-44298</guid>
		<description>You have such a twisted and biased view on PPP. Get over yourself. What is wrong with putting and post which is clearly advertising into a blog.  You do it on Techcrunch.  If you dont know that a PPP isnt advertising you also probably couldnt use a computer....so whats the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have such a twisted and biased view on PPP. Get over yourself. What is wrong with putting and post which is clearly advertising into a blog.  You do it on Techcrunch.  If you dont know that a PPP isnt advertising you also probably couldnt use a computer&#8230;.so whats the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-42447</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-42447</guid>
		<description>If I disclose that I&#039;m sleeping with your girlfriend, does that make it OK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I disclose that I&#8217;m sleeping with your girlfriend, does that make it OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog World Expo Blog &#187; PayPerPost to host blogging conference PostiCon&#8230;. Controversy follows</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-42217</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog World Expo Blog &#187; PayPerPost to host blogging conference PostiCon&#8230;. Controversy follows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-42217</guid>
		<description>[...] More reaction at CrunchNotes, Ryan Stewart, Chip Griffin, Joe Duck, webomatica, Dumpster Bust. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More reaction at CrunchNotes, Ryan Stewart, Chip Griffin, Joe Duck, webomatica, Dumpster Bust. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Watching the Growing Pains of the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-42072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Watching the Growing Pains of the Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-42072</guid>
		<description>[...] Robert is catching a lot of flack over his agreement (and he&#8217;s since had it modified a bit so that PayPerPost isn&#8217;t actually paying his salary). Mike Arrington took a different stance when PayPerPost offered to advertise and decided he didn&#8217;t want to be associated with them. All fair in my mind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert is catching a lot of flack over his agreement (and he&#8217;s since had it modified a bit so that PayPerPost isn&#8217;t actually paying his salary). Mike Arrington took a different stance when PayPerPost offered to advertise and decided he didn&#8217;t want to be associated with them. All fair in my mind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra &#187; Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-41985</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra &#187; Robert Scoble please quit ruining my quiet weekends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-41985</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course all the usual anti-PPP proponents came out immediately after the post with stuff like &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; or &#8220;Robert Scoble announces that he&#8217;s become a paid shill for PayPerPost&#8221; - as a side note I have read Robert&#8217;s post over and over and nowhere did I see him announce that. That misrepresentation of what Robert is supposed to have said I find even more questionable than I do of Robert&#8217;s announcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course all the usual anti-PPP proponents came out immediately after the post with stuff like &#8220;Robert Scoble got sucked into the PayPerPost machine&#8221; or &#8220;Robert Scoble announces that he&#8217;s become a paid shill for PayPerPost&#8221; &#8211; as a side note I have read Robert&#8217;s post over and over and nowhere did I see him announce that. That misrepresentation of what Robert is supposed to have said I find even more questionable than I do of Robert&#8217;s announcement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony K</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-41947</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-41947</guid>
		<description>Robert, I still think you are great, I just hate that you are associating with such a deceptive company as PPP. 

And I would say that a politician or a business leader who goes to China endorses China’s human rights policies, maybe not directly, but by doing business with China, they are at least giving indirect approval to the fact that it doesn&#039;t prevent them from doing business with China. They are associating with a government that doesnt value human rights and that would make me question the integrity and character of said businessman or politician. And I would have an issue doing business with this businessman. Politics is a shakey ground because there could be other agendas like trying to encourage change in those polcies.

But hey you could always go to the conferance and just rip the heck out of PPP and everyone will love you again. Just don&#039;t waste any of your video interviews on these people.

And please don&#039;t take this as an attack, it truly isn&#039;t, I just thought John&#039;s comment really made it sound like that you speaking at the conference was also an endorsment of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I still think you are great, I just hate that you are associating with such a deceptive company as PPP. </p>
<p>And I would say that a politician or a business leader who goes to China endorses China’s human rights policies, maybe not directly, but by doing business with China, they are at least giving indirect approval to the fact that it doesn&#8217;t prevent them from doing business with China. They are associating with a government that doesnt value human rights and that would make me question the integrity and character of said businessman or politician. And I would have an issue doing business with this businessman. Politics is a shakey ground because there could be other agendas like trying to encourage change in those polcies.</p>
<p>But hey you could always go to the conferance and just rip the heck out of PPP and everyone will love you again. Just don&#8217;t waste any of your video interviews on these people.</p>
<p>And please don&#8217;t take this as an attack, it truly isn&#8217;t, I just thought John&#8217;s comment really made it sound like that you speaking at the conference was also an endorsment of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-41837</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-41837</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s like saying a politician or a business leader who goes to China endorses China&#039;s human rights policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s like saying a politician or a business leader who goes to China endorses China&#8217;s human rights policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/02/03/scoble-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-41835</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=352#comment-41835</guid>
		<description>Tony: &gt;&gt;Robert is validating and endorsing PPP. PPP is a deceptive company and now Scoble and PodTech are associating themselves with PPP.

And the reverse is also true. PPP has paid people to attack me in the past. It&#039;s a company I don&#039;t agree with (at least I won&#039;t until they require per-item disclosures, just like I did with my disclosure). 

But, I disagree with you that this is an endorsement by me. Anyone who sees it as such really hasn&#039;t done their homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony: &gt;&gt;Robert is validating and endorsing PPP. PPP is a deceptive company and now Scoble and PodTech are associating themselves with PPP.</p>
<p>And the reverse is also true. PPP has paid people to attack me in the past. It&#8217;s a company I don&#8217;t agree with (at least I won&#8217;t until they require per-item disclosures, just like I did with my disclosure). </p>
<p>But, I disagree with you that this is an endorsement by me. Anyone who sees it as such really hasn&#8217;t done their homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
