<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valleywag Just Out Thought Peter Rip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the hooplah about StatsaHolic &#171; Startup Dunia - Indian startups and Entrepreneurship</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/#comment-59482</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s the hooplah about StatsaHolic &#171; Startup Dunia - Indian startups and Entrepreneurship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=373#comment-59482</guid>
		<description>[...] I just dont get it. Just last week the entire Web2.0 blogosphere weighed in on Peter Rip&#8217;s post on the demise of Web2.0 and criticized him for depending on the reliability of Alexa&#8217;s stats. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just dont get it. Just last week the entire Web2.0 blogosphere weighed in on Peter Rip&#8217;s post on the demise of Web2.0 and criticized him for depending on the reliability of Alexa&#8217;s stats. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank wang</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/#comment-58545</link>
		<dc:creator>frank wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=373#comment-58545</guid>
		<description>Well, Valleywag actually got it wrong: it compared Alexa Reach (which represents the number of unique visitors per day) with Techcrunch’s sitemeter pageview number. 

Techcrunch’s pageviews from Alexa and pageviews from its sitemeter stats match quite well.

I put together some graphs to show that on my blog:
http://lifeisaventure.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/how-to-use-alexas-traffic-stats/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Valleywag actually got it wrong: it compared Alexa Reach (which represents the number of unique visitors per day) with Techcrunch’s sitemeter pageview number. </p>
<p>Techcrunch’s pageviews from Alexa and pageviews from its sitemeter stats match quite well.</p>
<p>I put together some graphs to show that on my blog:<br />
<a href="http://lifeisaventure.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/how-to-use-alexas-traffic-stats/" rel="nofollow">http://lifeisaventure.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/how-to-use-alexas-traffic-stats/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam benayoun</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/#comment-56560</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam benayoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=373#comment-56560</guid>
		<description>Why people continue to base their assumptions/posts on Alexa' stats? They arent accurate and arent reflecting the real statistic of a site, maybe an overall trend, but that's all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why people continue to base their assumptions/posts on Alexa&#8217; stats? They arent accurate and arent reflecting the real statistic of a site, maybe an overall trend, but that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not Web 2.0 &#8212; it&#8217;s just the Web &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/20/valleywag-just-out-thought-peter-rip/#comment-56555</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s not Web 2.0 &#8212; it&#8217;s just the Web &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=373#comment-56555</guid>
		<description>[...] Valleywag has more on the Alexa issue here, and Mike Arrington points out that his traffic has just kept going up, which kind of undermines Peter&#8217;s thesis somewhat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valleywag has more on the Alexa issue here, and Mike Arrington points out that his traffic has just kept going up, which kind of undermines Peter&#8217;s thesis somewhat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
