<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Unacceptable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Extending My Support to Kathy Sierra, Maryam Scoble, and All Victims of Threats and Bashing &#124; PR2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-194692</link>
		<dc:creator>Extending My Support to Kathy Sierra, Maryam Scoble, and All Victims of Threats and Bashing &#124; PR2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-194692</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington says, “In some ways, I see it as a cost to doing business. But if you find yourself making anonymous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington says, “In some ways, I see it as a cost to doing business. But if you find yourself making anonymous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArianaSits</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-194627</link>
		<dc:creator>ArianaSits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-194627</guid>
		<description>Great! Thank you very much! I always wanted to write in my blog something like that. Can I take part of your post to my site? Of course, I will add backlink? Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thank you very much! I always wanted to write in my blog something like that. Can I take part of your post to my site? Of course, I will add backlink? Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogosphere death threats - definitely not cool — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-194591</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogosphere death threats - definitely not cool — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-194591</guid>
		<description>[...] will be taking a week off from blogging in support. Stowe Boyd adds his support to a lady besieged. CrunchNotes says this is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be taking a week off from blogging in support. Stowe Boyd adds his support to a lady besieged. CrunchNotes says this is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaces&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Be Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-194394</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaces&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Be Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-194394</guid>
		<description>[...] a group of popular bloggers have been threatened and harassed on their blog sites. Read here. It is pretty scary to think that any information you put out on the web could come back to haunt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a group of popular bloggers have been threatened and harassed on their blog sites. Read here. It is pretty scary to think that any information you put out on the web could come back to haunt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Licence to Roam &#187; Civility and Copyright</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-150100</link>
		<dc:creator>Licence to Roam &#187; Civility and Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-150100</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, the comments may not be from the people named, but the posters are consistent throughout the stream and I&#8217;m hoping Mathew has done a cursory look at IP addresses to do some verification. Given that Arrington is one of the most influential tech bloggers, who earlier this year came out with statement below regarding the Kathy Sierra situation I find it astounding that he can use the same tactics that he previously decried. In this case they are not anonymous but they are ad hominem and should be avoided. A lot of people we interact with daily seem very normal. But put them behind a keyboard and allow them to make anonymous comments and some really evil stuff can result. There’s no clear line as to what’s acceptable and not acceptable. But if you find yourself making anonymous attack comments that may be going overboard, ask yourself if you really want to be causing people the kind of pain that Kathy is going through. And then just stop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, the comments may not be from the people named, but the posters are consistent throughout the stream and I&#8217;m hoping Mathew has done a cursory look at IP addresses to do some verification. Given that Arrington is one of the most influential tech bloggers, who earlier this year came out with statement below regarding the Kathy Sierra situation I find it astounding that he can use the same tactics that he previously decried. In this case they are not anonymous but they are ad hominem and should be avoided. A lot of people we interact with daily seem very normal. But put them behind a keyboard and allow them to make anonymous comments and some really evil stuff can result. There’s no clear line as to what’s acceptable and not acceptable. But if you find yourself making anonymous attack comments that may be going overboard, ask yourself if you really want to be causing people the kind of pain that Kathy is going through. And then just stop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogosfera, condotte e condottieri &#171; FreddyBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-63465</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogosfera, condotte e condottieri &#171; FreddyBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-63465</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogosfera, condotte e&#160;condottieri  “Molte persone con cui interagiamo quotidianamente sembrano piuttosto normali. Ma mettile davanti a una tastiera e permetti loro di lasciare commenti anonimi e può venire fuori della roba davvero maligna”. Concordo appieno con le parole di Michael Arrington che così commentava gli attacchi e le minacce mosse anonimamente alla blogger Kathy Sierra. Anche per questo di tutti i punti individuati nel codice di condotta per blogger – proposto recentemente da Tim O’Reilly e aperto ai contributi della blogosfera – quello che impedisce (o almeno circoscrive) i commenti anonimi, mi sembra davvero l’aspetto centrale. Non solo perché di per sé è risolutivo di buona parte delle altre questioni (senza la necessità di trasformare i blogger in una sorta di tutori della rete costituita o dell’internettianamente corretto), ma anche perché se l’obiettivo è – come viene indicato nella bozza di codice – “creare una cultura che incoraggi l’espressione personale e la conversazione costruttiva” il metterci la faccia è il requisito minimo. Una volta si diceva: avere il coraggio delle proprie idee… com’è che è passato così di moda? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogosfera, condotte e&nbsp;condottieri  “Molte persone con cui interagiamo quotidianamente sembrano piuttosto normali. Ma mettile davanti a una tastiera e permetti loro di lasciare commenti anonimi e può venire fuori della roba davvero maligna”. Concordo appieno con le parole di Michael Arrington che così commentava gli attacchi e le minacce mosse anonimamente alla blogger Kathy Sierra. Anche per questo di tutti i punti individuati nel codice di condotta per blogger – proposto recentemente da Tim O’Reilly e aperto ai contributi della blogosfera – quello che impedisce (o almeno circoscrive) i commenti anonimi, mi sembra davvero l’aspetto centrale. Non solo perché di per sé è risolutivo di buona parte delle altre questioni (senza la necessità di trasformare i blogger in una sorta di tutori della rete costituita o dell’internettianamente corretto), ma anche perché se l’obiettivo è – come viene indicato nella bozza di codice – “creare una cultura che incoraggi l’espressione personale e la conversazione costruttiva” il metterci la faccia è il requisito minimo. Una volta si diceva: avere il coraggio delle proprie idee… com’è che è passato così di moda? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaces - &#187; Be Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-63337</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaces - &#187; Be Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-63337</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, a group of popular bloggers have been threatened and harassed on their blog sites. Read here. It is pretty scary to think that any information you put out on the web could come back to haunt you in the future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, a group of popular bloggers have been threatened and harassed on their blog sites. Read here. It is pretty scary to think that any information you put out on the web could come back to haunt you in the future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchNotes &#187; My Thoughts On O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Code of Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-62929</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchNotes &#187; My Thoughts On O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Code of Conduct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-62929</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim O&#8217;Reilly has posted a draft code of conduct that bloggers would voluntarily accept and promote. This all stems from the Kathy Sierra/Chris Locke issue from a couple of weeks ago. The New York Times is all over this as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim O&#8217;Reilly has posted a draft code of conduct that bloggers would voluntarily accept and promote. This all stems from the Kathy Sierra/Chris Locke issue from a couple of weeks ago. The New York Times is all over this as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Very Real Right to be Frightened - Ramblings of the Mildly Insane</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-62121</link>
		<dc:creator>A Very Real Right to be Frightened - Ramblings of the Mildly Insane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-62121</guid>
		<description>[...] Just for the record, I&#8217;m not condemning anyone, however, I&#8217;m not absolving anyone either. I don&#8217;t think anyone who created or promoted the site actually made the threats, but I do believe they have some responsibility. It&#8217;s one thing to have a site that chides people, but it&#8217;s quite another to have a site with no moderation or rules with the sole purpose of chiding people. That&#8217;s an obvious recipe for disaster. A lot of people we interact with daily seem very normal. But put them behind a keyboard and allow them to make anonymous comments and some really evil stuff can result. There’s no clear line as to what’s acceptable and not acceptable. (CrunchNotes) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just for the record, I&#8217;m not condemning anyone, however, I&#8217;m not absolving anyone either. I don&#8217;t think anyone who created or promoted the site actually made the threats, but I do believe they have some responsibility. It&#8217;s one thing to have a site that chides people, but it&#8217;s quite another to have a site with no moderation or rules with the sole purpose of chiding people. That&#8217;s an obvious recipe for disaster. A lot of people we interact with daily seem very normal. But put them behind a keyboard and allow them to make anonymous comments and some really evil stuff can result. There’s no clear line as to what’s acceptable and not acceptable. (CrunchNotes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauri G Gronroos</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/03/26/this-is-unacceptable/comment-page-1/#comment-60370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauri G Gronroos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=377#comment-60370</guid>
		<description>Sierra had quite innovative way to promote herself! For a while I even felt sorry for her...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sierra had quite innovative way to promote herself! For a while I even felt sorry for her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
