<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Thoughts On O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Code of Conduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Censura sin límites (uséase, código ético) &#124; Noticias</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-194480</link>
		<dc:creator>Censura sin límites (uséase, código ético) &#124; Noticias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-194480</guid>
		<description>[...] 11 abril Me gusta especialmente esta frase de Mike Arrington: &#8220;&#8230; whenever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11 abril Me gusta especialmente esta frase de Mike Arrington: &#8220;&#8230; whenever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts On O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Code of Conduct : Scott&#8217;s Morning Brew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-64761</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts On O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Code of Conduct : Scott&#8217;s Morning Brew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-64761</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: CrunchNotes » My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: CrunchNotes » My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogger Code of Conduct...Learn from Wikipedia &#171; ValueWiki Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-64321</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger Code of Conduct...Learn from Wikipedia &#171; ValueWiki Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-64321</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington writes that he will never agree to a code of conduct. Jason Calacanis writes in his usual poetic style, &#8220;$%#$ Conduct!&#8221; The Associated Press writes this article, &#8220;Bloggers rail against imposing civility online.&#8221; And Jim Benson suggests his own Code of Conduct, Don&#8217;t Blog Stupid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington writes that he will never agree to a code of conduct. Jason Calacanis writes in his usual poetic style, &#8220;$%#$ Conduct!&#8221; The Associated Press writes this article, &#8220;Bloggers rail against imposing civility online.&#8221; And Jim Benson suggests his own Code of Conduct, Don&#8217;t Blog Stupid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim O&#8217;Reilly is an Asshole &#171; insignificant thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-64179</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim O&#8217;Reilly is an Asshole &#171; insignificant thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-64179</guid>
		<description>[...] Not wanting to leave him on his own, let me share some Mike Arrington: I’m not turning off anonymous comments, I’m not going to always try to talk privately with someone before i write, and I’m also not going to allow a mob to decide what types of words constitute “unacceptable content.” And I’m certainly not putting a badge on my site that says whether I comply or not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not wanting to leave him on his own, let me share some Mike Arrington: I’m not turning off anonymous comments, I’m not going to always try to talk privately with someone before i write, and I’m also not going to allow a mob to decide what types of words constitute “unacceptable content.” And I’m certainly not putting a badge on my site that says whether I comply or not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A blogger code of conduct? at Wired Gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-64070</link>
		<dc:creator>A blogger code of conduct? at Wired Gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-64070</guid>
		<description>[...] To an extent the call for a code of conduct to regulate blogger conduct in the wake of the Kathy Sierra incidents has a similar air about it that the call for support for often overly restrictive measures to combat terrorism in the wake of 9-11. After 9-11 there was a tremendous amount of solidarity for the American people and what soon happened is that George W Bush and his administration capitalised on that support and introduced a series of measures designed to give him more power to deal with suspected terrorists and anyone else who opposed him. Pretty soon there was this question being asked whether people are with Bush or against him and if they were against him then they were somehow un-American and not patriotic. The rhetoric went so far that some people were saying that if you weren&#8217;t for Bush and his initiatives then you were for the terrorists. Now that is a chilling assertion to make. Judging from the feedback to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s code of conduct, I wonder if a similar mentality isn&#8217;t emerging here. Take a look at Mike Arrington&#8217;s thoughts about the proposed code of conduct: I&#8217;ve mostly stayed out of this fight, but as it has gone on I&#8217;ve been more and more disappointed by what I&#8217;ve seen. I feel bad for Kathy Sierra and said as much. But she and others have milked this event for all its worth, and then some. And whenever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can and cannot do by defining &#8220;civility&#8221; around their own ideals, I tense up. It feels like a big angry mob is arming itself to the teeth and looking for targets, and I need to choose whether I&#8217;m with them or against them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To an extent the call for a code of conduct to regulate blogger conduct in the wake of the Kathy Sierra incidents has a similar air about it that the call for support for often overly restrictive measures to combat terrorism in the wake of 9-11. After 9-11 there was a tremendous amount of solidarity for the American people and what soon happened is that George W Bush and his administration capitalised on that support and introduced a series of measures designed to give him more power to deal with suspected terrorists and anyone else who opposed him. Pretty soon there was this question being asked whether people are with Bush or against him and if they were against him then they were somehow un-American and not patriotic. The rhetoric went so far that some people were saying that if you weren&#8217;t for Bush and his initiatives then you were for the terrorists. Now that is a chilling assertion to make. Judging from the feedback to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s code of conduct, I wonder if a similar mentality isn&#8217;t emerging here. Take a look at Mike Arrington&#8217;s thoughts about the proposed code of conduct: I&rsquo;ve mostly stayed out of this fight, but as it has gone on I&rsquo;ve been more and more disappointed by what I&rsquo;ve seen. I feel bad for Kathy Sierra and said as much. But she and others have milked this event for all its worth, and then some. And whenever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can and cannot do by defining &ldquo;civility&rdquo; around their own ideals, I tense up. It feels like a big angry mob is arming itself to the teeth and looking for targets, and I need to choose whether I&rsquo;m with them or against them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De nieuwe reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gedragscode voor blogs: anonieme reacties niet toestaan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-63982</link>
		<dc:creator>De nieuwe reporter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gedragscode voor blogs: anonieme reacties niet toestaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-63982</guid>
		<description>[...] Meer duidelijkheid Ook Michael Arrington (van TechCrunch) ziet niets in de gedragscode. De voorstellen gaan te ver en zijn te dwingend, vindt hij. &quot;De gedragscode en alle bloggers die zich daarachter scharen, boezemen mij meer angst in dan alle doodsbedreigingen die ik in het verleden heb ontvangen.&quot; [W]henever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can and cannot do by defining “civility” around their own ideals, I tense up. It feels like a big angry mob is arming itself to the teeth and looking for targets, and I need to choose whether I’m with them or against them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meer duidelijkheid Ook Michael Arrington (van TechCrunch) ziet niets in de gedragscode. De voorstellen gaan te ver en zijn te dwingend, vindt hij. &#8220;De gedragscode en alle bloggers die zich daarachter scharen, boezemen mij meer angst in dan alle doodsbedreigingen die ik in het verleden heb ontvangen.&#8221; [W]henever someone, no matter how much I respect them, tries to tell me what I can and cannot do by defining “civility” around their own ideals, I tense up. It feels like a big angry mob is arming itself to the teeth and looking for targets, and I need to choose whether I’m with them or against them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-63939</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-63939</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to this party but I will say I agree. The idea is ridiculous only because high authority blogs (those people actually visit and pay attention to, like this one) tend to generally be wrapped around people who are good at self governing their actions. 

I shut out the Kathy Sierra story after the first day because I felt it was overhyped and dramatic. Even I get hate email and all I&#039;m talking about are clothes and shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to this party but I will say I agree. The idea is ridiculous only because high authority blogs (those people actually visit and pay attention to, like this one) tend to generally be wrapped around people who are good at self governing their actions. </p>
<p>I shut out the Kathy Sierra story after the first day because I felt it was overhyped and dramatic. Even I get hate email and all I&#8217;m talking about are clothes and shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 博客的文明守則</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-63804</link>
		<dc:creator>博客的文明守則</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-63804</guid>
		<description>[...] My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog-You.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 博客的文明守則</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-63801</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog-You.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 博客的文明守則</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-63801</guid>
		<description>[...] My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/04/09/my-thoughts-on-oreillys-code-of-conduct/comment-page-2/#comment-63712</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=381#comment-63712</guid>
		<description>I really wonder what all the bruhaha is about. Anyone who wants to adopt Tim&#039;s code is free to do so and display the badge. Anyone who does not want to, is free not to. Even free to still display the badge, there&#039;s nothing Tim can do to prevent you. So what&#039;s all the excitement about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder what all the bruhaha is about. Anyone who wants to adopt Tim&#8217;s code is free to do so and display the badge. Anyone who does not want to, is free not to. Even free to still display the badge, there&#8217;s nothing Tim can do to prevent you. So what&#8217;s all the excitement about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
