<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow Up To My Sky Is Falling Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: traditional bingo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-139438</link>
		<dc:creator>traditional bingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-139438</guid>
		<description>This site will teach you all about online bingo in online casinos and we will show you how to win great sums of money in a short period of time. When you look for an online casino, be sure to check with us first, since we can show you where to find the best online casino on the internet and how to play the best games
traditional bingo - http://www.realitybingo.com/yusun-kim-banks-wins-500-000.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site will teach you all about online bingo in online casinos and we will show you how to win great sums of money in a short period of time. When you look for an online casino, be sure to check with us first, since we can show you where to find the best online casino on the internet and how to play the best games<br />
traditional bingo - <a href="http://www.realitybingo.com/yusun-kim-banks-wins-500-000.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realitybingo.com/yusun-kim-banks-wins-500-000.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside Deals are the New Currency at Dealmaker&#8217;s Insider Party -- bub.blicio.us</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-80496</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside Deals are the New Currency at Dealmaker&#8217;s Insider Party -- bub.blicio.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-80496</guid>
		<description>[...] Was this on of those events that per Michael Arrington of TechCrunch was contributing to the need for a reset in Silicon Valley? Hardly&#8230;although it was a popular topic of conversation. Just for the record, we are nowhere near a need for a downturn and the &#8220;sky isn&#8217;t falling yet.&#8221;  So far, the vibe is positive, encouraging, and people are generally supportive.  There&#8217;s more money than people are willing to take. Companies are focusing on building communities, and for now, that is the levy that is keeping Silicon Valley from flooding. Other notable guests included: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Was this on of those events that per Michael Arrington of TechCrunch was contributing to the need for a reset in Silicon Valley? Hardly&#8230;although it was a popular topic of conversation. Just for the record, we are nowhere near a need for a downturn and the &#8220;sky isn&#8217;t falling yet.&#8221;  So far, the vibe is positive, encouraging, and people are generally supportive.  There&#8217;s more money than people are willing to take. Companies are focusing on building communities, and for now, that is the levy that is keeping Silicon Valley from flooding. Other notable guests included: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaid</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-79031</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-79031</guid>
		<description>"what’s going on is that people are paying more attention to valuations, parties, etc., and not enough to products and user experience."

You nailed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what’s going on is that people are paying more attention to valuations, parties, etc., and not enough to products and user experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>You nailed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Yates</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-79023</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-79023</guid>
		<description>"Conspiracy theory" seems a bit strong, but I suppose if I protest too much it will draw attention to my theory about how the Kennedy family framed Pete Rose.

Look, the only reason I commented was because the original post was so good. If I had the problems that Michael talked about, I'd be looking for solutions such as offloading the weepy CEOs onto the most junior writers.

As for the bubble, I probably did go too far, but the most important point is that -- bubble or not -- what's going on is that people are paying more attention to valuations, parties, etc., and not enough to products and user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Conspiracy theory&#8221; seems a bit strong, but I suppose if I protest too much it will draw attention to my theory about how the Kennedy family framed Pete Rose.</p>
<p>Look, the only reason I commented was because the original post was so good. If I had the problems that Michael talked about, I&#8217;d be looking for solutions such as offloading the weepy CEOs onto the most junior writers.</p>
<p>As for the bubble, I probably did go too far, but the most important point is that &#8212; bubble or not &#8212; what&#8217;s going on is that people are paying more attention to valuations, parties, etc., and not enough to products and user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Roussey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-79011</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Roussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-79011</guid>
		<description>I thought lots of VC money led to lots of parties. Free drinks. Good times. I figured it was a good time to hike up from L.A. for a moment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought lots of VC money led to lots of parties. Free drinks. Good times. I figured it was a good time to hike up from L.A. for a moment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-78970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 00:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-78970</guid>
		<description>Regarding Scott's comment:

Duncan has only been writing with us for three weeks now, so I don't think it's quite time for conspiracy theories yet. He actually has a free hand to post on whatever he pleases. That's cause he is a kick ass blogger and I trust him.

On the bubble stuff - I intentionally didn't talk about a bubble because I don't think we're in one. Bubble" is different from "good times". My point is, and remains, that when the money is flowing, SV is a less desirable place to live (for me).

Dave, on the voting thing, no idea. It's working for me right now. We've actually been testing this plugin for possible use on TechCrunch and it just isn't proving to be very reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Scott&#8217;s comment:</p>
<p>Duncan has only been writing with us for three weeks now, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite time for conspiracy theories yet. He actually has a free hand to post on whatever he pleases. That&#8217;s cause he is a kick ass blogger and I trust him.</p>
<p>On the bubble stuff - I intentionally didn&#8217;t talk about a bubble because I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re in one. Bubble&#8221; is different from &#8220;good times&#8221;. My point is, and remains, that when the money is flowing, SV is a less desirable place to live (for me).</p>
<p>Dave, on the voting thing, no idea. It&#8217;s working for me right now. We&#8217;ve actually been testing this plugin for possible use on TechCrunch and it just isn&#8217;t proving to be very reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-78968</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-78968</guid>
		<description>I feel Scott made a very intelligent comment that at least deserves a response. In fact, I was not able to give it a positive vote. I tried to, and the vote system appears to only not work on his comment. Any reason for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel Scott made a very intelligent comment that at least deserves a response. In fact, I was not able to give it a positive vote. I tried to, and the vote system appears to only not work on his comment. Any reason for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Zawodny</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-78949</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zawodny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-78949</guid>
		<description>I feel like I got the message of the original post (and mostly agree with it), but it definitely touched in a nerve in some folks.  That alone tells me that there's been a shift going on, whether or not people want to admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I got the message of the original post (and mostly agree with it), but it definitely touched in a nerve in some folks.  That alone tells me that there&#8217;s been a shift going on, whether or not people want to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-78906</link>
		<dc:creator>rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-78906</guid>
		<description>I would agree with Marcelo - TC is reading a lot like the WSJ. Perhaps its time to do some TC spinoffs - one for major BigCo industry news, one for more blog-worthy startup type news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with Marcelo - TC is reading a lot like the WSJ. Perhaps its time to do some TC spinoffs - one for major BigCo industry news, one for more blog-worthy startup type news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelo Calbucci</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/05/22/follow-up-to-my-sky-is-falling-post/#comment-78870</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Calbucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=397#comment-78870</guid>
		<description>I actually read your post yesterday around 5:00 AM PDT before all the fuzz and I concluded something very different from everybody else.

In my view it would be much better if TechCrunch would stop writing "package" stories from BigCo (GOOG, MSFT, YHOO, etc.). You are just being a puppet on their PR machine.

Go back to the roots. Only talk to founders and CEO, CTO and COO. Don't accept calls or emails from PR, Marketing Consultants, CMO, VP of Marketing, VCs, investors, etc.

There is nothing wrong with those people, but they are inclined to always spin stories and to package things in a neat and uninteresting way. Founders are the least capable people on interviews, that is why they are so raw and interesting. That is when you get the scoop.

-Marcelo, a Founder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually read your post yesterday around 5:00 AM PDT before all the fuzz and I concluded something very different from everybody else.</p>
<p>In my view it would be much better if TechCrunch would stop writing &#8220;package&#8221; stories from BigCo (GOOG, MSFT, YHOO, etc.). You are just being a puppet on their PR machine.</p>
<p>Go back to the roots. Only talk to founders and CEO, CTO and COO. Don&#8217;t accept calls or emails from PR, Marketing Consultants, CMO, VP of Marketing, VCs, investors, etc.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with those people, but they are inclined to always spin stories and to package things in a neat and uninteresting way. Founders are the least capable people on interviews, that is why they are so raw and interesting. That is when you get the scoop.</p>
<p>-Marcelo, a Founder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
