<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marc Andreessen: Doom &#038; Gloom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ames Tiedeman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/#comment-116809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames Tiedeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=405#comment-116809</guid>
		<description>This is the doom and gloom I see...or it is an opportunity if I am correct. In any event, I am deeply worried about the U.S. 

Gold will go way up, maybe to $1,500 an ounce or higher because the dollar will fall for years. The dollar will keep falling and here is why:
The U.S. cannot sustain 800 bilion a year trade deficits. We cannot export our way out of this mess. The only answer is a sharply lower dollar to drive manufactruing home and to lower the trade deficit. The dollar has much farther to fall. What you are seeing is a long term effort (it will take 20 years) to get the trade deficit back under 1% of GDP. We are currently running a trade imbalance of nearly 6% of GDP. No nation can do this. The IMF would be stepping in to help any nation if its trade imbalance went to 6% of GDP becuase its currency would collapse! The U.S. is different, but still, we cannot sustain a trade deficit of this magnitude. People must understand that when we buy an item from say China, we pay in dollars. The Chinese company we just bought from them goes to an Exchange Bank in China and converts those dollars to Yuan. The Chinese banking system (Chinese Government) is now sitting on those dollars. They can either 1, buy oil, 2, buy Treasuries, 3. buy U.S goods, 4. buy U.S. Corporations, 5. other. Over time if we (the U.S. ) continue to run a trade deficit we could simply be completely bought and controlled by foreigners. Warren Buffet has explained the situation as being like a rich Texas farmer who loses a small piece of his land year after year and never notices for a while. When he then notices, tragedy sets in because he no longer controls his land. So in sum, we need to get the trade deficit way down. This is why the Fed has abandoned the dollar. It wil be going down for the next 20 years. That is how long it is going to take to correct this imbalance mess. Bottom line: Lower, much lower dollar will equal higher inflation and higher GOLD prices. Much higher!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the doom and gloom I see&#8230;or it is an opportunity if I am correct. In any event, I am deeply worried about the U.S. </p>
<p>Gold will go way up, maybe to $1,500 an ounce or higher because the dollar will fall for years. The dollar will keep falling and here is why:<br />
The U.S. cannot sustain 800 bilion a year trade deficits. We cannot export our way out of this mess. The only answer is a sharply lower dollar to drive manufactruing home and to lower the trade deficit. The dollar has much farther to fall. What you are seeing is a long term effort (it will take 20 years) to get the trade deficit back under 1% of GDP. We are currently running a trade imbalance of nearly 6% of GDP. No nation can do this. The IMF would be stepping in to help any nation if its trade imbalance went to 6% of GDP becuase its currency would collapse! The U.S. is different, but still, we cannot sustain a trade deficit of this magnitude. People must understand that when we buy an item from say China, we pay in dollars. The Chinese company we just bought from them goes to an Exchange Bank in China and converts those dollars to Yuan. The Chinese banking system (Chinese Government) is now sitting on those dollars. They can either 1, buy oil, 2, buy Treasuries, 3. buy U.S goods, 4. buy U.S. Corporations, 5. other. Over time if we (the U.S. ) continue to run a trade deficit we could simply be completely bought and controlled by foreigners. Warren Buffet has explained the situation as being like a rich Texas farmer who loses a small piece of his land year after year and never notices for a while. When he then notices, tragedy sets in because he no longer controls his land. So in sum, we need to get the trade deficit way down. This is why the Fed has abandoned the dollar. It wil be going down for the next 20 years. That is how long it is going to take to correct this imbalance mess. Bottom line: Lower, much lower dollar will equal higher inflation and higher GOLD prices. Much higher!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen W. Carson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/#comment-83502</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen W. Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=405#comment-83502</guid>
		<description>"You can’t predict bubbles when you are in the middle of one, which means you can’t predict them at all." Maybe *you* can't. The "Austrian" school of economics has a pretty remarkable record though. Mises and Hayek predicted the 1929 crash, (not that they named the day but that they saw it coming when other economists were saying we had entered a "new prosperity" and such). Similarly, Austrian economists called the .com bubble and crash as documented here: http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=38&#38;articleID=212

As Thornton writes in that linked article: "Attempts to measure economic aggregates precisely have failed to forecast the boom and bust cycle accurately, but economists who focused on basic cause-and-effect relationships among economic phenomena were among the most prescient predictors of the 2000 stock-market bubble and crash."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can’t predict bubbles when you are in the middle of one, which means you can’t predict them at all.&#8221; Maybe *you* can&#8217;t. The &#8220;Austrian&#8221; school of economics has a pretty remarkable record though. Mises and Hayek predicted the 1929 crash, (not that they named the day but that they saw it coming when other economists were saying we had entered a &#8220;new prosperity&#8221; and such). Similarly, Austrian economists called the .com bubble and crash as documented here: <a href="http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=38&amp;articleID=212" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=38&amp;articleID=212</a></p>
<p>As Thornton writes in that linked article: &#8220;Attempts to measure economic aggregates precisely have failed to forecast the boom and bust cycle accurately, but economists who focused on basic cause-and-effect relationships among economic phenomena were among the most prescient predictors of the 2000 stock-market bubble and crash.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bubble Fear Is a Neccesary Evil &#8212; Telegraphik</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/#comment-83061</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bubble Fear Is a Neccesary Evil &#8212; Telegraphik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=405#comment-83061</guid>
		<description>[...] There seems to be a lot of talk about bubbles. Truthfully I used to have a fear of soap bubbles especially when I was in the bathtub. I don&#8217;t really remember the dot com bubble because the companies I worked for seemed pretty immune to it. The environment of one place I worked at changed significantly after the bubble burst. They took away our been bags and our free bagels. Later the bagels were reinstated but we never got our bean bags back. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There seems to be a lot of talk about bubbles. Truthfully I used to have a fear of soap bubbles especially when I was in the bathtub. I don&#8217;t really remember the dot com bubble because the companies I worked for seemed pretty immune to it. The environment of one place I worked at changed significantly after the bubble burst. They took away our been bags and our free bagels. Later the bagels were reinstated but we never got our bean bags back. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre nosalsky</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/#comment-83042</link>
		<dc:creator>andre nosalsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=405#comment-83042</guid>
		<description>It's all cyclical. And somebody usually pushes the cycle and once critical mass is reached it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. This time you got the ball rolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all cyclical. And somebody usually pushes the cycle and once critical mass is reached it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. This time you got the ball rolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaspers the grate</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/03/marc-andreessen-doom-gloom/#comment-83034</link>
		<dc:creator>vaspers the grate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=405#comment-83034</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 is full of crappy coding, feature emphasis rather than greatness in software, and virtual vaporware-ish hype.

I just wrote a "Top Web 2.0 Problems" post on my blog, click my name to read it. In that post, I give specific examples of failures and errors of Popfly, Joost, Instructables, and others. 

"Beta" = screw the users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 is full of crappy coding, feature emphasis rather than greatness in software, and virtual vaporware-ish hype.</p>
<p>I just wrote a &#8220;Top Web 2.0 Problems&#8221; post on my blog, click my name to read it. In that post, I give specific examples of failures and errors of Popfly, Joost, Instructables, and others. </p>
<p>&#8220;Beta&#8221; = screw the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
