<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hah. Battelle Says His Authors Should Have Disclosed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Remember how pissed Michael Arrington was? : Tech That Out</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-102021</link>
		<dc:creator>Remember how pissed Michael Arrington was? : Tech That Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-102021</guid>
		<description>[...] he said that from this article on CruchNotes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he said that from this article on CruchNotes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; BigBang chez BlogBang?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-101877</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; BigBang chez BlogBang?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-101877</guid>
		<description>[...] Les réactions sont sans doute excessives du côté des bloggeurs (même si justifiées) mais BlogBang vient d&#8217;apprendre une leçon très simple: si vous voulez impliquez les bloggeurs dans votre modèle économique, soyez transparents et communiquez auprès de vos partenaires surtout en situation de crise. Dans un autre registre, aux Etats Unis Federated Media, une régie publicitaire a connu les foudres de ses bloggeurs récemment lors d&#8217;une campagne publicitaire de Microsoft critiquée par ValleyWag et qui a amené cette régie à dire que ces bloggeurs portaient la responsabilité du problème. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Les réactions sont sans doute excessives du côté des bloggeurs (même si justifiées) mais BlogBang vient d&#8217;apprendre une leçon très simple: si vous voulez impliquez les bloggeurs dans votre modèle économique, soyez transparents et communiquez auprès de vos partenaires surtout en situation de crise. Dans un autre registre, aux Etats Unis Federated Media, une régie publicitaire a connu les foudres de ses bloggeurs récemment lors d&#8217;une campagne publicitaire de Microsoft critiquée par ValleyWag et qui a amené cette régie à dire que ces bloggeurs portaient la responsabilité du problème. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming Yeow</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91743</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91743</guid>
		<description>most of the commenters here are missing the point. The question here is whether mike should have disclosed (and his point is that it was so obviously disclosed), and not whether he should have allowed his name on a crappy marketing campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of the commenters here are missing the point. The question here is whether mike should have disclosed (and his point is that it was so obviously disclosed), and not whether he should have allowed his name on a crappy marketing campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Think &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newswatch 6.25.07: YHOO sales chief is out</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91644</link>
		<dc:creator>I Think &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newswatch 6.25.07: YHOO sales chief is out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91644</guid>
		<description>[...] YHOO sales chief out [AP] Yahoo Inc. said Sunday that its chief domestic sales officer resigned and that the company will merge its search and display advertising departments in the U.  Yahoo sales chief is out [WebProNews] The post-Terry Semel era at Yahoo sees a shakeup at the top of its cross-platform, North America sales team, as Wenda Harris Millard moves from the portal company to Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. — Did Millard jump or was she pushed? Hah. Batelle says his authors should have disclosed [TechCrunch] More happenings on the sponsored text debate: John Battelle, CEO of FM Publishing, the ad network behind the ads, throw his authors, including us, under a bus today when he writes: … hmm. Disclose? Disclose what? Defamation lawsuit seeks to unmask anonymous cowards [The Register] Server logs? what server logs? — They should've known better than to flame law students. — Two female law students at Yale University have filed a lawsuit in a federal district court in Connecticut against an operator …  Macs 'snap-crackle-pop' after 10.4.1 [InfoWorld] Apple's update to Mac OS X 10.4.10 last week is driving some users crazy from a new popping sound. Dubbed "Snap Crackle Pop" on Apple's support forum by the first to note the problem, the noise was irritating enough for one to call it "maddening," while another claimed it "would slowly drive me insane." [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YHOO sales chief out [AP] Yahoo Inc. said Sunday that its chief domestic sales officer resigned and that the company will merge its search and display advertising departments in the U.  Yahoo sales chief is out [WebProNews] The post-Terry Semel era at Yahoo sees a shakeup at the top of its cross-platform, North America sales team, as Wenda Harris Millard moves from the portal company to Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. — Did Millard jump or was she pushed? Hah. Batelle says his authors should have disclosed [TechCrunch] More happenings on the sponsored text debate: John Battelle, CEO of FM Publishing, the ad network behind the ads, throw his authors, including us, under a bus today when he writes: … hmm. Disclose? Disclose what? Defamation lawsuit seeks to unmask anonymous cowards [The Register] Server logs? what server logs? — They should&#8217;ve known better than to flame law students. — Two female law students at Yale University have filed a lawsuit in a federal district court in Connecticut against an operator …  Macs &#8217;snap-crackle-pop&#8217; after 10.4.1 [InfoWorld] Apple&#8217;s update to Mac OS X 10.4.10 last week is driving some users crazy from a new popping sound. Dubbed &#8220;Snap Crackle Pop&#8221; on Apple&#8217;s support forum by the first to note the problem, the noise was irritating enough for one to call it &#8220;maddening,&#8221; while another claimed it &#8220;would slowly drive me insane.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonja</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91530</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91530</guid>
		<description>How many times do you listen to the radio and hear on-air talent pushing dog food, Lasik and the latest Chrysler product? These people say nothing about the content being an ad but just launch into it, and once they get started, you know it's an ad. Words in a banner? Same idea but much more clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times do you listen to the radio and hear on-air talent pushing dog food, Lasik and the latest Chrysler product? These people say nothing about the content being an ad but just launch into it, and once they get started, you know it&#8217;s an ad. Words in a banner? Same idea but much more clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Controverse rond &#8216;conversational marketing&#8217; - 27-06-2007 - Content Cantina</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91441</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Controverse rond &#8216;conversational marketing&#8217; - 27-06-2007 - Content Cantina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91441</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington is woedend dat John Battelle van Federated Media, dat de sales doet voor de bloggers in kwestie, de schuld naar de bloggers probeert te schuiven, en zoekt per direct een nieuwe sales agent: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington is woedend dat John Battelle van Federated Media, dat de sales doet voor de bloggers in kwestie, de schuld naar de bloggers probeert te schuiven, en zoekt per direct een nieuwe sales agent: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 June 26 &#124; www.theirway.net</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91347</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 June 26 &#124; www.theirway.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91347</guid>
		<description>[...] Hah. Batelle says his authors should have disclosed [TechCrunch] More happenings on the sponsored text debate: John Battelle, CEO of FM Publishing, the ad network behind the ads, throw his authors, including us, under a bus today when he writes: … hmm. Disclose? Disclose what? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hah. Batelle says his authors should have disclosed [TechCrunch] More happenings on the sponsored text debate: John Battelle, CEO of FM Publishing, the ad network behind the ads, throw his authors, including us, under a bus today when he writes: … hmm. Disclose? Disclose what? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vaspers the grate</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-91258</link>
		<dc:creator>vaspers the grate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-91258</guid>
		<description>Figures that PayPerPost spam would appear on this thread.

Hey PayPerPost, how's the blog-whoring business coming along? Lots of sleazy "will opine for compensation" bloggers out there for ya?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figures that PayPerPost spam would appear on this thread.</p>
<p>Hey PayPerPost, how&#8217;s the blog-whoring business coming along? Lots of sleazy &#8220;will opine for compensation&#8221; bloggers out there for ya?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchNotes &#187; Sorry, You&#8217;ve Mistaken Me For Someone Who Gives A Damn</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-90953</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchNotes &#187; Sorry, You&#8217;ve Mistaken Me For Someone Who Gives A Damn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-90953</guid>
		<description>[...] That wasn&#8217;t the case (see my previous posts on my position), but it didn&#8217;t stop authors like Malik and Kedrosky from immediately folding, and FM CEO Battelle from giving his authors a quick slap on the wrist for not disclosing the &#8220;conflict.&#8221; Suddenly I found myself fighting alone in a sea of controversy, which is right where I like to be. The main fallout from the event is that we are now looking for new ad agent representation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That wasn&#8217;t the case (see my previous posts on my position), but it didn&#8217;t stop authors like Malik and Kedrosky from immediately folding, and FM CEO Battelle from giving his authors a quick slap on the wrist for not disclosing the &#8220;conflict.&#8221; Suddenly I found myself fighting alone in a sea of controversy, which is right where I like to be. The main fallout from the event is that we are now looking for new ad agent representation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/06/23/hah-battelle-says-his-authors-should-have-disclosed/#comment-90948</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=410#comment-90948</guid>
		<description>I didn't see a single person bitched about the "search for better search" sponsored by Hakia. I didn't see any disclosure and I'm OK with that since it says SPONSORED BY HAKIA.

Where's all the Hakia rage?  Was there something truly different about People Ready besides running where an AD ran and having MICROSOFT slapped all over it instead of saying "Sponsored by Micorosft" or is this just humans being hypocrites?

If there's truly a difference other than in one case it was MSFT and in once case it wasn't, I'd really like to understand it. I don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see a single person bitched about the &#8220;search for better search&#8221; sponsored by Hakia. I didn&#8217;t see any disclosure and I&#8217;m OK with that since it says SPONSORED BY HAKIA.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s all the Hakia rage?  Was there something truly different about People Ready besides running where an AD ran and having MICROSOFT slapped all over it instead of saying &#8220;Sponsored by Micorosft&#8221; or is this just humans being hypocrites?</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s truly a difference other than in one case it was MSFT and in once case it wasn&#8217;t, I&#8217;d really like to understand it. I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
