<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow. We&#8217;re worth $100 million!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Adventures of Captain Obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-194239</link>
		<dc:creator>The Adventures of Captain Obvious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-194239</guid>
		<description>[...] this the kind of quality investigative journalism you&#8217;d expect from a publication reputedly worth a cool one hundred million dollars (or more)? I mean, VentureBeat says that Google will expand Android onto STBs, MP3 players, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this the kind of quality investigative journalism you&#8217;d expect from a publication reputedly worth a cool one hundred million dollars (or more)? I mean, VentureBeat says that Google will expand Android onto STBs, MP3 players, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.carversation.com</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-136055</link>
		<dc:creator>www.carversation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-136055</guid>
		<description>wow. FERRARIS. that is amazing. i would assume thats high but who cares that is a lotta money. i think you guys should give some back to the commentators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. FERRARIS. that is amazing. i would assume thats high but who cares that is a lotta money. i think you guys should give some back to the commentators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yeh</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120879</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120879</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Those darn analysts must be getting paid by potential acquirers to talk down the acquisition price.  Clearly nothing less than a billion-dollar exit will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Those darn analysts must be getting paid by potential acquirers to talk down the acquisition price.  Clearly nothing less than a billion-dollar exit will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Raynovich</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120641</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Raynovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120641</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I've done some analysis... 

http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=466&#38;doc_id=135539&#38;

Good luck. I recommend you consider offers under $100M. 

--Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done some analysis&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=466&amp;doc_id=135539&#038;amp" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=466&amp;doc_id=135539&#038;amp</a>;</p>
<p>Good luck. I recommend you consider offers under $100M. </p>
<p>&#8211;Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Buying Spree? &#171; point being:</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120434</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Buying Spree? &#171; point being:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120434</guid>
		<description>[...] October 3, 2007   It&#8217;s been clear for a while that the most popular blogs are faring much better than their traditional media counterparts when it comes to growing readership and pulling in ad revenue. Today, Henry Blodget (he of the Amazon $400 stock prediction) put his finger in the wind and came up with the valution of $100m+ for TechCrunch. Michael Arrington was, unsurprisingly, delighted. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 3, 2007   It&#8217;s been clear for a while that the most popular blogs are faring much better than their traditional media counterparts when it comes to growing readership and pulling in ad revenue. Today, Henry Blodget (he of the Amazon $400 stock prediction) put his finger in the wind and came up with the valution of $100m+ for TechCrunch. Michael Arrington was, unsurprisingly, delighted. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120432</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120432</guid>
		<description>Haha...fantastic Mike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha&#8230;fantastic Mike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch&#8217;s REAL Valuation</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120429</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch&#8217;s REAL Valuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120429</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been a huge fuss about TechCrunch&#8217;s valuation and a possible buy-out from CNET. A $100 million price tag has been tossed around and Arrington has joked about the whole situation. Rumours and possible acquisitors aside, let&#8217;s explore a deeper issue - the valuation. Digging even deeper, let&#8217;s take a look at how a blog (in particular) should be valued. Surprisingly enough, I&#8217;m not even going to use numbers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been a huge fuss about TechCrunch&#8217;s valuation and a possible buy-out from CNET. A $100 million price tag has been tossed around and Arrington has joked about the whole situation. Rumours and possible acquisitors aside, let&#8217;s explore a deeper issue - the valuation. Digging even deeper, let&#8217;s take a look at how a blog (in particular) should be valued. Surprisingly enough, I&#8217;m not even going to use numbers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechSheep &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow. We&#8217;re worth $100 million! (Mike/CrunchNotes)</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120411</link>
		<dc:creator>TechSheep &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow. We&#8217;re worth $100 million! (Mike/CrunchNotes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120411</guid>
		<description>[...] Wow.&#160; We&#8217;re worth $100 million!&#160; &#8212;&#160; Not a day after I trash Henry Blodget for touting Google stock at $2,000 a share he write a post titled &#8220;TechCrunch to Sell to CNET for $100+ Million?&#8221;&#160; &#8212;&#160; So first of all I owe Blodget a big apology.&#160; The guy is bright, insightful and dead on with his valuation predictions.   Source: &#160; CrunchNotes Author: &#160; Mike Link: &#160; http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wow.&nbsp; We&#8217;re worth $100 million!&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Not a day after I trash Henry Blodget for touting Google stock at $2,000 a share he write a post titled &#8220;TechCrunch to Sell to CNET for $100+ Million?&#8221;&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; So first of all I owe Blodget a big apology.&nbsp; The guy is bright, insightful and dead on with his valuation predictions.   Source: &nbsp; CrunchNotes Author: &nbsp; Mike Link: &nbsp; <a href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426" rel="nofollow">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc crowley</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120401</link>
		<dc:creator>dc crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120401</guid>
		<description>I think there is a bug in Henry Blodget's internal software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a bug in Henry Blodget&#8217;s internal software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchnotes.com/2007/10/03/wow-were-worth-100-million/#comment-120400</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=426#comment-120400</guid>
		<description>Hey, Mike, can we start talking stock options? Hello? Mike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Mike, can we start talking stock options? Hello? Mike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
